Author Archives: safi4yes

Thank you for your support.

Due to the continuing confusion over the Scots Asians for Yes and Scots Asians for Independence, I think this site and the campaign has served its purpose during the referendum and it is time to move onto something new, so I will no longer be acting as a facilitator -until the next time.

It will remain up and can be used as an archive to remember how so many of us came together from all backgrounds, to work towards independence.

That dream has not died, just hibernating for the time being, but our work starts once we get Scotland’s voice heard at Westminster. Please support our only ethnic candidate Tasmina Sheikh and make sure she wins!

Thank you for your support and good wishes to all our readers and especially to our contributors who joined us on this incredible journey.

Best wishes


Nighet Riaz

Soar Alba

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Conversations with @safi4yes members #GE2015

Last weekend, Neil Hay invited Sohail Haque, Nighet Riaz and Moni Tagore for an informal discussion around the General Election.

A special thanks to Gerry Mulvenna and Ian Russell and Edinburgh Yes Cafe

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Our reply to the Sunday Herald article

An article published today in the Sunday Herald by Tom Gordon, shares the viewpoints of Mr Muhammad Shoaib on his  previous political party and also his thoughts of fellow members.

This article shows clearly why we must always continue to work and support those who work hard at building and integrating communities and are torch bearers for us to work in a progressive nation. There is no place for racism or derogatory language. Tasmina Sheikh is one such individual amongst many I know, who has worked hard in the political sphere. We commiserate that Mr Shoaib feels he did not receive the recognition or reward for his endeavours but this does not entitle him or others to denigrate those that are succeeding on merit in a very competitive field.

Many of us are first,  second or third generation ethnic minority citizens. We do not need anyone to define us as ‘pure’ or otherwise. We are who we are, and that is enough. To deny that there are issues of racism, discrimination or dissension within ranks of any political party would be naive, but counteracting it with name calling really is a case of ‘the pot calling the kettle black’ and aiming those comments at a woman, who is a mother and wife is disrespectful, especially from those that call themselves our community representatives. I have respect for those that work towards progressive solutions, not those that suffer from the malaise of entitlement whatever their background may be. 

Perhaps the time has come for our political parties to implement zero tolerance policies into their codes of conduct, along with cultural awareness training to encourage greater understanding of different communities.

Perhaps its time to embed the equalities agenda into each piece of legislation and start putting this into practise. It is something I and many others would actively encourage, if it is to create a better society for all of us.


Nighet Riaz




Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized


Mr Muhammad Shoaib, yesterday was photographed with Anas Sarwar and Margaret Curran in an article in the Daily Record (06 April 2015), clearly stating him as organiser of Scots Asians for Independence.  This is correct.

Mr Shoaib has and was never associated with Scots Asians for Yes.

Scots Asians for Yes is a campaign that worked closely with Yes Scotland, and is much broader in its approach, encouraging everyone from different political backgrounds and none to have their voices heard across the length and breadth of Scotland, as is illustrated in our blog throughout the referendum period.

Nighet Riaz


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

#Yes reasons still valid for building a better future

Scots Asians for Yes

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

On RIC 2014

The original article can be found here.

RIC’s Jonathon Shafi looks ahead to Saturday’s gathering and lays out some of the ways that this has been curated into a more participatory forward-focused event.

Everyone remembers those exciting days and weeks on the lead up the referendum. For most of us this was the most exciting political period we had ever been part of. It was full of possibility and potential. This excitement expressed itself on the streets of cities, the town has of villages and in the Yes posters plastered all over our communities. The future was in our hands, and the movement of movements which was forging the way to a new Scotland was vibrant, inclusive and diverse.

After a mass canvass about two weeks before the referendum conversation turned to this years RIC conference. If it was a Yes vote, we’d have to look for a bigger venue. We would be discussing our new constitution, the massive changes in the political landscape, citizens assemblies and so on. But what if it was a No vote? Many of us felt that we should still run a RIC conference, but that it would be difficult, and small in number.

The day after the vote we announced the conference. Thousands clicked they would like to attend on Facebook. Okay, we thought, that’s great. But is it just an initial act of defiance? Could the rebellion last? It did. In many ways those days exciting days before the referendum continue. In the first 24 hours of ticket sales we sold out our initial venue catering for 1000 people. We had to upgrade to the Clyde Auditorium, and within two weeks we had sold 3000 tickets.

This is the kind of situation you can’t plan for. It reflects the deep and profound political awakening that has taken place thanks to the referendum process. Every pro-independence organisation reports the same: new interest, surging attendance at meetings and fundamentally a determination that we are not going back in our box. This is what happens when people feel they have a voice in the political debate. The independence movement has stoked and embraced this process. On the other hand, it highlights why Westminster does not want genuine political engagement, because when it happens, they can’t control it.

RIC has been an inspiring and testing experience for everyone involved. It is run by volunteers, and organised in local groups. It has been inspiring because it shows that even if you don’t have an established name, or any money, you can make a contribution that makes an impact. For the same reasons, it has been testing. For new campaigns, every moment in their development is a test that must be passed. If the first conference was a flop, it would not have got off the ground. If the second conference was not an improvement, there would have been speculation about its demise. If it did not transfer the energy of the meetings and conferences into mass action in communities, it would have been written off as a talking shop. All of this, and much more, has been an immense challenge.

We had to navigate the media, and in the main, we managed to get our narrative about the importance of class into the centre of the debate, without media consultants, advertising resources or special advisers. Every step of the way, for all of us, has been a learning curve.

But the biggest challenge we face now is political. What direction should we take? How can we be most useful to the movement? What are our priorities? There are no easy answers for this. But we can be sure of some key features. We will remain as a broad movement of the radical left in Scotland. We will continue to engage on the social issues affecting ordinary people, and intensify our international relationships and outlook. We will remain an outward looking body of activism, inventing our own initiatives as well as supporting other people’s campaigns for social justice.

All of this is crystallised in the conference on Saturday. 3000 people will have 3000 different ideas of what makes a good conference. With an event of this scale there is a huge challenge to ensure detailed discussion of key issues. That is why we went the extra mile of booking multiple venues, to allow for break out sessions. The discussions fit with our ethos to include broad forces, to encourage diversity of opinion, and to engage in serious debate about the issues our movement faces.

People from all sorts of backgrounds are attending. Socialists, greens, trade unionists, students, CND activists, SNP members and so on. Hundreds have even booked from across, England from Liverpool to London. We will also be joined by international delegations. The day is divided into three streams: Radical Change Now, Radical Debates and Radical Organising. In each stream there are six workshops and a mass forum running in parallel.

The workshops will allow for more specific discussion on important issues, while the mass forums in the auditorium theatre will be huge meetings on strategy and tactics, including major speakers such as Tariq Ali and an international rally with the likes of Syriza, Podemos, Quebec Solidaire and the CUP.  The day will culminate in a ‘Peoples Vow’ which will contain a series of initiatives that we agree will be carried out. Our message is that the politicians vow was not worth the paper it was written on, but that the people’s commitment to genuine social change has not dampened, and will be taken out across the country in our continuing campaign.

Logistics on the day are another huge task, full of possible pitfalls and problems. But to ensure every effort is taken to create a smooth running event, we will have a team of 100 volunteer stewards. We have over 70 speakers representing dozens of organisations. The conference passes will have phone numbers to call if you are lost, or having a problem. Our chairs will be ready to facilitate discussion. Every ticket holder is being emailed so that people can book their chosen workshop (s) in advance. We will have an interactive social media operation. Creche facilities staffed by professional child minders will help to make the event inclusive. We are doing all of this with volunteers, and trying to meet costs as best we can.

The reason for spelling this out is to make clear that we want this day to be more than inspiring, but strategic and coherent in its outcome. Every single workshop, plenary and mass forum will be recorded and put online the week after the event. We want this to help campaigning work after the event. It will allow people to show the meetings to local groups, to look back and find out the key points that were agreed. The entire event, thanks to Independence Live will be live streamed. Your comments will be noted, and added into post conference strategies and ideas.

Nothing on this scale has been tried before on the Scottish Left, at least not for some time. It is a testament to the hard work, strategic intelligence and dedication of activists the length and breadth of Scotland that it can be attempted in the first place. And it is thanks to the historic referendum process that people are so engaged with political ideas. The political awakening is here to stay and it is radical in outlook. RIC is only one part of this, and the start of our contribution post-No is this conference. If you have a ticket, we hope you thoroughly enjoy it, have a chance to impart your own ideas, and learn for others and will join in the debate. If you don’t, we hope you will follow and engage with it on social media. We still believe that another Scotland is possible. From land reform to opposing austerity and privatisation, radical ideas are now firmly part of mainstream discourse in Scottish politics. Those ideas will help to improve peoples lives in the here and now, and they will be critical to winning independence in the long run.

See the full timetable here:

Make a donation to help cover costs:

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Rise and Rise of the SNP

Original article by Wasim Mahmood can be found here.


If the end of the referendum on Scottish independence was expected to bring a sense of closure and the resumption of normal service, the outcome has thrown up more questions than it has put to rest. With a rejuvenated political scene and a highly charged electorate, the dust has not so much settled as it has resembled the outpouring of energy following a nuclear reaction. It is evidence enough that each day brings with it a fresh twist in the post-referendum landscape while the interest of the viewing public shows no sign of fatigue. In this atomic atmosphere, the sub-plot following each side has been as intriguing as the marathon campaign for the referendum itself. Such, that the denouement to this particular narrative is now suspended until the General Election.

Rarely, if ever, in any contest have the fortunes of the winners and losers been juxtaposed in such consequential fashion. Though Alex Salmond may have fallen on his sword in the immediate aftermath of defeat, first minister-elect, Nicola Sturgeon will ascend her throne in spectacular style this week with her party dominating domestic affairs as well as impacting the Westminster scene. Buoyed by a resounding party conference over the weekend , swelling support and popular appeal, Sturgeon possesses an extraordinarily strong-hand meaning it is no surprise to see her trailed by a cacophony of sound as she sets out her mandate on a sell-out tour at venues across the country ordinarily reserved for rock stars.

Of course, as President Obama will attest, popularity alone is no guarantor of success and has only limited weight in elected office. If the SNP really are to apply the coup de grace to Scottish Labour, usurp the party at the General Election and assume the role of potential kingmaker, they will require a stellar performance in all areas of its governance spearheaded by the newly-crowned First Minister. This is not overly ambitious and requires the continuation of sound political stewardship that has seen them uproot an entrenched two-party system and come within a hairline of undoing a 300-year old union. Perhaps the only political movement anywhere in the world more popular after seven years in office than when they entered, these are heady times for the SNP as they look to turn the screw on Westminster over its promise of more powers for Scotland made during closing stages of the campaign.

By contrast, Scottish Labour now finds itself ravaged in the face of victory. So far has Labour stock plummeted following a bruising referendum campaign, the party has a fight on its hands just to remain relevant in Scotland. Jolted by last month’s opinion poll which apportioned them a paltry 23% share of a vote in a land they once dominated, the irony is lost on no one that they now find themselves caught in a vicious turf war with their Westminster headmasters in a struggle for greater autonomy. To arrest this free fall, Scottish Labour’s only road to redemption lies in divergence to the path set by the UK party. When its current leadership has to deliberate whether or not it would repeal a law as heinous as the bedroom tax, the disdain for an underclass it still claims sole compassion for becomes clear.

The conundrum however is this: to launch any sort of recovery, it requires a fresh-faced leader ready to cut loose from the party’s current trajectory and introduce a fresh set of ideas congruent to the egalitarian values it once espoused. Yet, such a move just would not be sanctioned by the New Labour machine, so far has it flung itself to the right in thrall to the politics of markets or bust that it has no desire for a return to anything remotely leftist.

For this reason, they have presented Jim Murphy MP, a man devoid of any fresh vision for Scotland and firmly in the mould of Westminster, as their chosen horse in the leadership contest for the Scottish branch. It is staggering that they believe fortunes can be reversed by Murphy, a charmless and abrasive operator best known as Tony Blair’s biggest cheerleader north of the border who continues to bellow out that the best reason for voting Labour is to keep out the Tories, as opposed to any obvious merits of its own. All this simply vindicates the parting shot from departed leader Johann Lamont that the party is spectacularly out of touch with the people of Scotland for it is an electorate well in advance of the narrow political discourse of Westminster.

With Westminster firmly in the last chance saloon, the question is not so much whether another referendum on independence will take place anytime soon but to what extent has the referendum on Scottish independence shaken up the established order of politics in the UK? With a General Election looming and a potential referendum on European Union membership, a disgruntled English electorate will shortly have their say on a debauched Westminster system.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized